LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/rohith-thammana-gowda-vs-rajini-nalini-ramesh-20220914/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Rohith Thammana Gowda vs Rajini Nalini Ramesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 September 2022
Case No.
Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 461/2022 in C.A. No. 4987/2022
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar
Citation
[2022] 5 S.C.R. 919 : 2022 INSC 1321
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 5 S.C.R. 919 : 2022 INSC 1321
Headnote

Judgment/Order – Additional direction – Held: Directions were issued in Paragraph 18 of the judgment dated 29.07.2022 – In addition to that, petitioner-husband directed to not take any coercive steps against the respondent-wife in any of the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, USA – Further, both the parties directed to file a joint application before the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, USA for mirroring the judgment dated 29.07.2022.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER In addition to the directions issued in paragraph 18(i) to (iv) of the judgment dated 29.07.2022, the following direction shall be read as direction No. 18 (v) of the said judgment: “The petitioner-husband shall not take any coercive steps against the respondent-wife in any of the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America.” The parties shall file a joint application before the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America duly signed by their respective counse
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →