Service Law – Selection Grade – Grant of – Respondentconductor was compulsorily retired from service in 2003 – He instituted suit in 2010 seeking benefit of first, second and third Selection Grades on completion of 9, 18 & 27 years of service – Trial court partially decreed the suit, directing that respondent shall be entitled to the grant of Selection Grade from 25 January 1992 on the completion of 9 years of service & the second Selection Grade pay scale from 7 January 2002 on the completion of 18 years of service –First Appellate Court as well as the High Court upheld the judgment of trial court – Held: The respondent waited for seven long years after his retirement to pursue a claim for grant of Selection Grade – It was clearly beyond the residuary period of limitation of three years provided in Art. 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act – That apart, grant of selection grade was not a matter of right and was subject to terms and conditions which were stipulated – In terms of Clause 7 of the scheme of Selection Grade only those employees whose service record was satisfactory were to be granted Selection Grade – Respondent failed to fulfill the terms and conditions as it did not fulfill the requirements of a clean record of service – During his service tenure, respondent was subjected to several disciplinary proceedings and as many as 19 charge-sheets were issued against him which resulted in penalties of varying nature – Thus, both on the question of limitation as well as on merits, respondent was not entitled to relief – Limitation Act, 1963 – Article
137 of the Schedule .
State of Rajasthan and Others v Shankar Lal Parmar (2011) 14 SCC 235: [2011] 11 SCR 762 – referred to.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.