LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/north-delhi-municipal-corporation-vs-harleen-kaur-ors-20191122/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Harleen Kaur & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
22 November 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 8974 of 2019
Result
Disposed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy
Citation
[2019] 18 S.C.R. 896 : 2019 INSC 1275
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 18 S.C.R. 896 : 2019 INSC 1275
Headnote

Service Law – Regularisation – High Court furnished cogent reasons for declining to interfere with the order of the Tribunal directing the appellant to consider the cases of respondents for regularization as Entomologists – Insofar as consequential monetary benefits is concerned, same directed to be granted w.e.f. date of the judgment of the Tribunal – Respondents entitled to notional pay fixation and continuity of service.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The High Court has furnished cogent reasons for declining to interfere with the order of the Tribunal directing the appellant to consider the cases of the respondents for regularization as Entomologists. 4. The respondents were appointed after public advertisement and were selected on the basis of interviews. They have been working since 1997-8. Though the appointment was contractual for a period of six months, it has been extended. Subsequently, on 14 July 2008, posts were created by conversion of
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →