LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/manoj-singh-negi-vs-ruchi-20240220-3/ · Printed 11 Jul 2026
Civil

Manoj Singh Negi vs Ruchi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 February 2024
Case No.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2023, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 139/2023, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 142/2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
Rajiv Shakdher, Amit Bansal
Acts & Sections
Hindu Marriage Act, §25 Hindu Marriage Act, §27
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
These are cross-appeals filed by the husband and wife against an order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the Principal Judge, South-East, Family Courts, Saket, New Delhi, on an application moved by the wife under Sections 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking permanent alimony and return of properties/stridhan. The Family Court had directed the husband to pay a lump sum permanent alimony of Rs. 6,00,000/- within six months and a monthly amount of Rs. 5,000/- per month until the wife remains legally entitled to receive the same.

The Delhi High Court, while listing the appeals for hearing on 23.04.2024, took note of the fact that no interim direction had been passed by the court and that the wife had not received any amount since the impugned order was rendered, despite interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month having been paid during the pendency of the divorce petition.

Pending the appeals, the Division Bench directed the husband to pay at minimum the monthly amount of Rs. 5,000/- as fixed by the impugned order, along with all arrears accumulated since the date of the impugned order, by the 10th day of March 2024, and to continue such payments thereafter.
Catchwords: permanent alimony stridhan Hindu Marriage Act cross-appeals matrimonial appeals interim maintenance monthly maintenance family court pending appeal directions

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 2, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court - Orders Manoj Singh Negi vs Ruchi on 20 February, 2024 Author: Rajiv Shakdher Bench: Rajiv Shakdher, Amit Bansal $~11,12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2023, CM APPL. 9660/2023 MANOJ SINGH NEGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr A.K. Mishra and Ms Sweeta Singh, Advocates. versus RUCHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms Nidhi Mohan Parashar and Mr Vikrant Kumar, Advocates. + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 139/2023, CM APPL. 25737/2023 MANOJ SINGH NEGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr A.K. Mishra and Ms Sweeta Singh, Advocates.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Civil