LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/maheshkumar-chandulal-patel-anr-vs-the-state-of-gujarat-ors-20240814/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Maheshkumar Chandulal Patel & Anr. vs The State of Gujarat & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 August 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 9059 of 2024
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Prashant Kumar Mishra
Citation
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 472 : 2024 INSC 608
Acts & Sections
Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 8 S.C.R. 472 : 2024 INSC 608
Issue for consideration
Applicability of the Rule of Stepping up of pay of a Government employee on the basis of the pay of his junior.
Headnote

Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 – Rule 21 – Stepping up of pay – Assistant Professors in Government Colleges in Gujarat – Applicability of:

Held: Rule of stepping up shall apply only if the anomaly is the direct result of the application of Rule 21 and only if the conditions specified therein are fulfilled – One of the condition stipulates that if even in the lower post, the junior Government employee draws a higher rate of pay than the senior, by way of fixation of the pay or by grant of advance increments, the same shall not be applicable to step up the pay of the senior Government employee – In the present case, the anomaly in pay is not a direct result of Rule 21 – Rather, the anomaly arose because of the fact that the Junior employees were granted the benefit of Senior Scale/Selection Grade Pay by taking into account the ad hoc services that they had rendered in the past – Hence, Rule 21 became inapplicable in the present case – Stepping up of pay in the present case would go against the principle of equity as the benefit cannot be given to those who were not even born in the cadre, for claiming benefits for the service that they have not actually rendered. [Paras 31, 32, 33]

Keywords: Service Law · Stepping up of pay

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Prastut Mahesh Dalvi, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shadan Farasat, Senior Advocate). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Vikram Nath, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals assail the common impugned order dated 28.12.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat in LPA No. 765/2017 in Special Civil Application No. 3210/2016 along with other allied appeals. The LPA was preferred by the respondent State of Gujarat against the order of Single Judge dated 19.04.2017 directing the State of Gujarat to remove the anomaly in the pay of the appellants Petitioners qua their juniors by stepping up their pay. The Division Bench allowed the LPA by the State and set aside the Single Judge’s order.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →