LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/m-s-r-d-sales-corporation-and-anr-vs-anoop-singh-gill-20241108-3/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Civil

M/S R.D. Sales Corporation And Anr vs Anoop Singh Gill

Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date
8 November 2024
Case No.
CR No.1662 of 2020 (O&M), CR No.1663 of 2020 (O&M), CR No.1664 of 2020 (O&M), CR No.6078 of 2018 (O&M)
Result
Disposed
Bench
Justice Deepak Gupta
Acts & Sections
East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act… §13 Chandigarh Sale of Sites and Building… §general
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
Four civil revision petitions were filed by the tenant, M/s R.D. Sales Corporation, against the landlord Anoop Singh Gill, arising out of a tenancy dispute concerning Shed No.433-A, Industrial Area, Phase-II, Chandigarh. The landlord instituted a rent petition seeking ejectment of the tenants under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949, on grounds of change of user, material impairment of value and utility of the premises, the premises having become unfit and unsafe for human habitation, bonafide necessity of the landlord, and non-payment of rent from August 2007 onwards.

The tenants contested the petition primarily on the ground that the landlord had not acquired valid ownership rights through an agreement to sell, irrevocable general power of attorney, affidavit, and Will executed by the original allottee Smt. Swaraj Katari, and that such documents could not confer title or the right to file an ejectment petition. The tenants further contended that they had been paying rent directly to Smt. Swaraj Katari through account payee cheques and had never received any valid intimation to pay rent to the respondent-landlord.

The High Court took up all four revision petitions together as they involved the same parties and the same demised premises, and proceeded to dispose of them by a common order addressing questions of landlord-tenant relationship, maintainability of the rent petition, and the validity of the grounds for ejectment under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949.
Catchwords: tenancy · ejectment · East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act 1949 · change of user · bonafide necessity · agreement to sell · general power of attorney · landlord-tenant relationship · maintainability · non-payment of rent · material impairment · industrial premises · Chandigarh

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 31, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court M/S R.D. Sales Corporation And Anr vs Anoop Singh Gill on 8 November, 2024 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146797 CR No.1662 of 2020 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:146797 CR No.1663 of 2020 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:146800 CR No.1664 of 2020 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:146802 CR No.6078 of 2018 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:146806 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: September 23, 2024 Date of Decision: November 08, 2024 (I) CR No.1662 of 2020 (O&M) M/s R.D. Sales Corpora5on and another ... Pe55oners Versus Anoop Singh Gill ...Respondent **** (II)
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All P&H HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →