LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/m-s-magadh-sugar-energy-ltd-vs-the-state-of-bihar-ors-20211020/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

M/s Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd. vs The State of Bihar & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 October 2021
Case No.
Miscellaneous Application No 1608 of 2021
Result
Disposed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, B.V. Nagarathna
Citation
[2021] 6 S.C.R. 1094 : 2021 INSC 648
Supreme Court Reports [2021] 6 S.C.R. 1094 : 2021 INSC 648
Headnote

Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – Amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment to be read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively – Amount of Rs 67 crores in paragraph 10 of the judgment to be read as Rs 67 lakhs – Appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh in paragraph

15 to be read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively – Judgment/Order.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Order of the Court was passed : ORDER 1. The Miscellaneous Application has been filed for correction of a typographical error in the judgment dated 24 September 2021. 2. The amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively and the amount of Rs 67 crores in paragraph 10 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 67 lakhs. 3. In paragraph 15 of the judgment, the appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh shall be corrected to read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →