LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/janam-singh-kudada-anr-vs-state-of-bihar-ors-20190827/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Janam Singh Kudada & Anr. vs State of Bihar & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
27 August 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 2575 of 2001
Result
Disposed
Bench
R.F. Nariman, R. Subhash Reddy, Surya Kant
Citation
[2019] 11 S.C.R. 1016 : 2019 INSC 956
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 11 S.C.R. 1016 : 2019 INSC 956
Headnote

Suit:

Suit for declaration that the plaintiffs were rightful owners of half share of the suit property - Suit decreed in respect of the entire suit property - Applying Wilkinson's Rule i.e. accepting the award passed by majority members of Panchayat - Appellate Authority affirmed the order - Writ petition was dismissed by Single Judge of High Court - Division Bench of High Court affirmed the order of Single Judge - Appeal to Supreme Court - Held: In the suit plaintiffs had claimed only half the suit property, hence decree awarding anything beyond the claim is liable to be set aside to that extent - In view of s. 2 of Kolhan Civil Justice Act also, the concurrent judgments, made on the basis of Wilkinson's Rule cannot be set aside - Bihar Kolhan Civil Justice (Regulation and Validation) Act, 1978 - s. 2.

Disposing of the appeal, the Court

HELD: In view of the fact that it is only half the property which went to the plaintiffs, as referred to in the plaint, that was the subject matter of the Suit, the decree will have to be set aside to the extent that it awards anything beyond this. In view of section 2 of Bihar Kolhan Civil Justice (Regulation and Validation) Act, 1978 as well, which admittedly has not been challenged by the appellants, it is difficult at this point of time to set aside the concurrent judgments which were made on the basis of application of Wilkinson's Rules. [Paras 8, 10] [1021A-B; 1022-A] Mora Ho v. State of Bihar and Others AIR 2000 Patna

101 - referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. F. NARIMAN, J. 1. After hearing learned counsel on behalf of the appellants for some time, and after having gone through the relevant provisions of the Constitution of India, the Wilkinson Rules and the Full Bench Judgment in 'Mora Ho v. State of Bihar and Others' reported as AIR 2000 Patna 101, we are of the view that it may not be necessary to go into the applicability and/or validity of the Wilkinson's Rules in this matter for two reasons. 2. First and foremost, as is correctly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the app
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →