LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/jagjiwan-coop-group-housing-society-ltd-ors-vs-lt-governor-nct-of-delhi-ors-20191024/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Jagjiwan Coop. Group Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. vs Lt. Governor, NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
24 October 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 3278 of 2012
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Arun Mishra, S. Ravindra Bhat
Citation
[2019] 16 S.C.R. 1046 : 2019 INSC 1185
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1046 : 2019 INSC 1185
Headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – ss.4, 5A, 17(1), (4) – Acquisition proceedings initiated by issuance of notification u/s.4 of the 1894 Act – Land proposed to be acquired for Vasant Kunj residential scheme– Appellant-Society claimed the ownership of the land – Appellant filed writ petition – High Court allowed the writ petition in part, maintaining the notification u/s.4 of the 1894 Act, but quashed the same with respect to invoking the provision of s.17(4) of the said Act – On merits, held: No case for interference is made out – There is no rhyme or reason to direct de-notification of the land – Prayer in that regard has already been rejected by the appropriate Government – Merely by the fact that one of the appellants is Cooperative Society, the complexion of the case does not change and this fact was duly taken note of at the time of land acquisition – Land acquisition could not be said to be illegal in any manner – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – ss.4 and 24(2).

Dismissing the appeals, the Court

HELD: 1.1 No case for interference is made out in the appeals filed at the instance of the appellants. There is no rhyme or reason to direct de-notification of the land and a prayer in that regard has already been rejected by the appropriate Government. Merely by the fact that one of the appellants is Cooperative Society, the complexion of the case does not change and this fact was duly taken note of at the time of land acquisition under the Act. Thus, no advantage can be derived from the policy of the State Government, the land acquisition could not be said to be illegal in any manner. There is no room for making indulgence to quash the land acquisition proceedings. [Para 5] [1048-F-G]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. The appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 3.2.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi. The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated by way of issuance of notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act). It was proposed to acquire the land for Vasant Kunj residential scheme. Enquiry under section 5A was dispensed with as section 17(1) was invoked. The society filed a representation for withdrawal of the notification and thereafter filed a wri
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →