Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules, 1982 – rr.2(c), 3, 4 – Reservation in recruitment – Recruitment by the Punjab Public Service Commission – Reservation for “ex-servicemen”, if includes personnel from the Indian Military Nursing Service-IMNS – Advertisement for recruitment to posts under the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch), wherein reservation provided for Ex-Servicemen – Appellant, an ex-servicemen having worked as Captain in the Medical Core of Indian Army, was appointed under the advertisement, however, the respondent released from IMNS, applied under the same advertisement as an ‘ex-serviceman’, but her candidature rejected on the ground that she did not qualify under this category – Writ petition by the respondent – Dismissed by the Single Judge, however allowed by the Division Bench – Interference with: Held: Not called for – Respondent no. 4 squarely falls within the definition of “ex-servicemen” defined in r.2(c) of the Punjab Rules – Considering the intention of the Punjab Rules to provide employment opportunities to those who served in the armed forces, and the language of r.2(c) that specifically includes Military personnel, no reason to exclude IMNS personnel from the category of “ex-servicemen” – Further, respondent no. 4 satisfies the requirements of Clause (iv) of r.2(c) as she was released from service upon completion of her service and was also paid gratuity – Kendriya Sainik Board’s purpose and objective is to formulate, advise on, and implement resettlement and welfare policies for ex-servicemen and their dependents – While the Board may determine the eligibility for these schemes and policies, such determination does not have any bearing on the Rules formulated by the State Government to provide reservations to ex-servicemen – Clarifications issued by the Board do not have a direct bearing on the Punjab Rules – Appellant has uninterruptedly continued in service since appointment in 2022 – Considering the passage of time, and her appointment and continued service in the post, it would cause great injustice if her appointment is cancelled or set aside at this point in time – Her eligibility has not been doubted in any manner or at any time – Respondent no. 4 qualifies as an ex-serviceman and must be considered under the “ex-servicemen” category – She is found to be meritorious, and if otherwise eligible, must be given an appointment. [Paras 17-22]
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.