LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/imtiyaz-ramzan-khan-vs-state-of-maharashtra-20180814/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Imtiyaz Ramzan Khan vs State of Maharashtra

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 August 2018
Case No.
SLP (Crl.) No. 6740 of 2018
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Abhay Manohar Sapre
Citation
[2018] 10 S.C.R. 953 : 2018 INSC 712
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 10 S.C.R. 953 : 2018 INSC 712
Headnote

Video conferencing: Arrangement of conducting video conferencing between the counsel and the accused made mandatory by the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee – Such a direction on part of Supreme Court Legal Services Committee is commendable and praiseworthy – It is essential for the counsels/Advocates appearing in matters entrusted by the Legal Services Committee to have the advantage of having a dialogue with either the accused or those having knowledge of details about the case – Attempt to facilitate dialogue between counsel and his client furthers the cause of justice and makes legal aid meaningful – Therefore, all Legal Services Authorities/Committees in every State to extend such facility in every criminal case wherever the accused is lodged in jail – Administration of criminal justice.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. Though these two special leave petitions are completely unconnected but they present one common feature and as such we propose to deal with these two special leave petitions by this common Judgment. 2. Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 6740 (D.No.20446 of 2018) of 2018 challenges the decision dated 30.08.2013 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissing Criminal Appeal No.986 of 2005 preferred by the petitioner and thereby affirming his conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentence of impris
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →