LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/harpreet-sawhney-vs-puneet-sharma-20260810-2/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Harpreet Sawhney vs Puneet Sharma

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
10 August 2026
Case No.
Civil Appeal No(s). 10509-10510 of 2026
Result
Disposed
Bench
Sanjay Karol, N Kotiswar Singh
Citation
[2026] 8 S.C.R. 472 : 2026 INSC 822
Acts & Sections
Constitution Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 CPC
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 8 S.C.R. 472 : 2026 INSC 822
Issue for consideration
Whether the quantum of maintenance fixed by the High Court requires reconsideration.
Headnote

Matrimonial Disputes – Maintenance – Enhancement of – High Court partly enhanced the child maintenance to Rs.1,25,000/per month for both the children – Plea of the Appellant-wife that the deductions as shown by the Respondent-husband are voluntary in nature and include voluntary contributions such as ESPPs which cannot be treated as compulsory deductions to reduce monthly income for the purposes of maintenance – In addition, it was also submitted that the Appellant’s deteriorating health due to aggressive breast cancer directly impacted her ability to cover the shortfall in the minor children’s expenses:

Held: Deductions of Provident Fund and ESPPs are ultimately benefits that would be passed on to the Respondent – Unlike Income Tax payment or professional taxes which are mandatory taxes, PFs and ESPPs are not permanent charges but rather will accrue into the account of the Respondent which can be withdrawn by the depositor in the future – Per interim order, the High Court had already directed interim maintenance towards the Appellant for Rs. 20,000/- per month – However, the interim maintenance is not mentioned in the final order – Maintenance enhanced to Rs.30,000/- per month, particularly keeping in mind the medical expenses for the cancer treatment of the Appellant who is looking after both children who reside with her – Monthly maintenance enhanced for both children to Rs.1,50,000/(Rs.75,000/- per child) with effect from 1st January 2025 – This will not preclude the Appellant from seeking enhancement as and when there are change in circumstances – In view of the undertaking given by the Respondent in the High Court order, no further direction is required as he has to abide by it – Respondent to do the needful as directed above within a period of 3 months from the date of this order. [Paras 18, 20-24]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeals filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India arises out of the the impugned Final Judgment and Order dated 14.08.2025 and Clarification Order dated 02.09.2025, passed by the High Court of Delhi in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 299/2024 with CONT. CAS(C) 634/2025, which partly enhanced the child maintenance to Rs.1,25,000/- for both children and closed the contempt proceedings against the Respondent-husband. The Clarification Order dated 02.09.2025 in CM Appl. 55169/2025 granted the Respondenthusband six months to cle
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →