LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ganesan-vs-the-state-rep-by-its-20251015-3/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal

Ganesan vs The State Rep By Its

Court
Madras High Court
Date
15 October 2025
Case No.
Crl.A.(MD).Nos. 212 of 2020, 172 of 2023, 293 of 2021, 331 of 2023, 396, 397, 399 & 400 of 2023, 507 of 2023 and 94 of 2024, 534 of 2022, 551 of 2023,
Bench
K.K. Ramakrishnan J
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §8(c) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §20(b)(ii)(C) CrPC §374 CrPC §374(2)
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These are a batch of criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by various accused persons convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by different Special Courts for NDPS Act Cases situated at Madurai and Pudukkottai. The appeals arise from convictions recorded in separate cases involving offences relating to possession, transport and sale of narcotic drugs including ganja, tried before the Additional Special Courts for NDPS Act Cases.

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court heard all the appeals together before the Honourable Mr. Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, having reserved judgment on 12.09.2025 and pronounced the same on 15.10.2025. The cases involve accused persons from Dindigul, Theni, Madurai, and Ramanathapuram districts, with prosecution conducted by the NIB-CID and local police stations.

The Additional Public Prosecutor appeared for the State respondent in all the connected matters, while individual counsel appeared for the respective appellants. The judgment addresses the legality and correctness of the convictions and sentences imposed under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, including sentences of rigorous imprisonment of ten years and fines imposed upon the convicted accused.
Catchwords: NDPS Act · narcotic drugs · ganja · possession · conviction · special court · criminal appeal · Section 374 CrPC · NIB-CID · rigorous imprisonment · fine · acquittal

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 105, Cited by 0] Madras High Court Ganesan vs The State Rep By Its on 15 October, 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved On : 12.09.2025 Pronounced On : 15.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.A.(MD).Nos. 212 of 2020, 172 of 2023, 293 of 2021, 331 of 2023, 396, 397, 399 & 400 of 2023, 507 of 2023 and 94 of 2024, 534 of 2022, 551 of 2023, 588 of 2023, 724 of 2023, 773, 953 of 2023, 265 of 2024, 322 of 2023, 269 and 558 of 2023 Crl.A.(MD).No.212 of 2020: Ganesan ... Appellant/Sole Accused Vs. The State rep by its, Th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Madras HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →