Dr. Vijay Mallya vs State Bank of India and Ors.

Court

Supreme Court of India

Date

31 August 2020

Case No.

Review Petition(C) Nos. 2175-2178 of 2018

Result

Dismissed

Bench

Uday Umesh Lalit, Ashok Bhushan

Citation

[2020] 13 S.C.R. 658 : 2020 INSC 523

Headnote

Review – Review of judgment dtd.09.05.17 sought – Held: On facts, it was an error on part of this Court to have observed and proceeded on the premise that no reply was filed by respondent no.3 to the response filed by the banks – However, attempt on part of respondent No.3 to have re-hearing in the matter cannot be permitted – No “error apparent on record” to justify interference in review jurisdiction – Review petitions dismissed.

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. These petitions seek review of the Judgment and Order dated 09.05.2017 passed by this Court in I.A. Nos.9-12 & 13-16 of 2016 in SLP (C) Nos.6828-6831 of 2016 with I.A. Nos.1-4 of 2016 in and with Contempt Petition (C) Nos.421-424 of 2016 in SLP (C) Nos.6828-6831 of 2016. 2. The facts leading to the passing of said judgment are set out in detail therein and for the present purposes we may set out following features. (A) In OA No.766 of 2013 filed by the special leave petitioners (‘banks’, for short) before DRT, Bengaluru see

View Subscription Plans →