LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dharmesh-dharmendra-dhamo-jagdishbhai-jagabhai-bhagubhai-ratadia-anr-vs-the-state-of-gujarat-20210707/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Dharmesh @ Dharmendra @ Dhamo Jagdishbhai @ Jagabhai Bhagubhai Ratadia & Anr. vs The State of Gujarat

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
7 July 2021
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 432 of 2021
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hemant Gupta
Citation
[2021] 8 S.C.R. 1 : 2021 INSC 323
Supreme Court Reports [2021] 8 S.C.R. 1 : 2021 INSC 323
Headnote

Bail: Imposition of condition for bail – Free fight between two groups in Amreli resulting in death of two persons – Case against

13 persons – Appellants, arrayed as accused no.12 and 13, were arrested – By impugned order, they were granted bail – However, they were aggrieved by the condition imposed on them for bail requiring them to deposit Rs.2 lakhs before the trial court as compensation to victims – Held: In cases of offences against body, compensation to the victim should be a methodology for redemption – Similarly, to prevent unnecessary harassment, compensation has been provided where meaningless criminal proceedings had been started – Such a compensation can hardly be determined at the stage of grant of bail – The direction contained in impugned order for deposit of compensation of Rs.2 lakhs for the legal heirs of the deceased is set aside – Specific allegation against the appellants was that they had beaten the complainant and the witnesses and not any of the deceased – Apart from the appellants, out of total 13 arrayed accused, 11 were released on bail by the High Court and/or Sessions Court – High Court in their cases, had imposed stringent conditions including an embargo from entering the geographical limits of Amreli and regularly marking presence before the police station amongst other conditions – In view of that, same terms and conditions imposed for grant of bail to the appellants – The direction for deposit of compensation of Rs.2 lakhs is substituted with the condition that the appellants will not enter the geographical limits of Amreli for a period of six months except for marking presence before the concerned police station and to attend the court proceedings – Appeal allowed.

Palaniappa Gounder v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. [1977] 3 SCR 132 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 1. An unfortunate incident took place on 10.11.2019, which is alleged by the complainant to be caused by certain members of his caste providing assistance to the police which resulted in a free fight where the appellants herein were also present. Two persons succumbed to their injuries and an FIR was registered on 11.11.2019 with the Amreli Police Station against 13 persons, being CR No.I-94 of 2019 under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 506(2), 504, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 120B and 34 of the IPC as well as Section 135(ii) of the
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →