LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/deep-mukerjee-vs-sreyashi-banerjee-20240405/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Deep Mukerjee vs Sreyashi Banerjee

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
5 April 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No(s). 4722-4723 of 2024
Result
Partly allowed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale
Citation
[2024] 4 S.C.R. 72 : 2024 INSC 274
Acts & Sections
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Evidence Act CPC
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 4 S.C.R. 72 : 2024 INSC 274
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to subjecting the husband to undergo potentiality test.
Headnote

Matrimonial laws – Matrimonial disputes – Medical tests – Potentiality test for husband – Divorce petition by the wife on the ground that the marriage between the parties was not consummated because of the husband’s impotency – Application by husband for subjecting the husband to undergo potentiality test and referring the wife for fertility test and psychological/mental health test for both the parties – Allowed by the trial court, however set aside by the High Court – Correctness:

Held: When the husband is willing to undergo potentiality test, the High Court should have upheld the order of the trial court to that extent – Order passed by the trial court directing the husband to take the medical test to determine his potentiality upheld – Impugned order passed by the High Court modified to that extent – Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Evidence Act, 1872. [Para 9]

Keywords: Divorce petition · Non-consummation of marriage · Impotency · Medical tests · Potential test · Fertility test · Psychological/mental health test

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in these appeals is to the common order dated 28.11.2023 passed by the High Court in Civil Revision Petition Nos. 2844 and 2848 of 2023 allowing the revisions while setting aside the order dated 27.06.2023 passed by the Trial Court in I.A. Nos. 8 & 9 of 2023 preferred by the appellant/husband in O.P. No. 2866 of 2021. 3. The parties were married on 23.07.2013 at Chennai and thereafter they agreed to move to the United Kingdom where they stayed together happily for a period of 7½ years. After they returned, they stayed together
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →