LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/council-of-the-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india-vs-shri-gurvinder-singh-anr-20181116/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India vs Shri Gurvinder Singh & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
16 November 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 11034 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
Citation
[2018] 14 S.C.R. 321 : 2018 INSC 1071
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 14 S.C.R. 321 : 2018 INSC 1071
Headnote

Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 : s.22 read with s.21, Schedule I Part IV – Other misconduct – Complaint against Chartered Accountant relating to sale of shares, transferred to the Chartered Accountant’s own name – Disciplinary Committee found his conduct derogatory in nature and held him guilty of ‘Other Misconduct’ u/s. 22/21 – Recommendation made by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants to the High Court to remove the Chartered Accountant for a period of six months from the rolls, however, the High Court did not impose any penalty – Correctness of – Held: High Court did not correctly appreciate s. 21(3) – Disciplinary Committee found the Chartered Accountant guilty of a practice which was not in the Chartered Accountant’s professional capacity – Under Schedule I Part-IV sub clause(2), the Council can hold Chartered Accountant guilty if their act brings disrepute to the profession whether or not related to his professional work – Thus, the order of the High Court is set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court to be decided afresh.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. F. NARIMAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal arises out of a complaint dated 16.03.2005 against Gurvinder Singh - Respondent No.1, who is a Chartered Accountant, relating to sale of 100 shares in 1999, which were transferred to the Chartered Accountant’s own name. 3. What has been pleaded before us is that the matter has ultimately been settled between the Complainant and the Chartered Accountant, despite which the Disciplinary Committee took up the case and ultimately found that the conduct of the Respondent No.1-Chartered Accountant
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →