LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/central-bank-of-india-others-vs-dragendra-singh-jadon-20220802/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Central Bank of India & Others vs Dragendra Singh Jadon

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
2 August 2022
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 5036 of 2022
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Indira Banerjee, J.K. Maheshwari
Citation
[2022] 13 S.C.R. 93 : 2022 INSC 782
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 13 S.C.R. 93 : 2022 INSC 782
Headnote

Service law – Res Judicata – Applicability of – Respondent was appointed to the post of agricultural assistant in the appellantBank – Respondent was served a chargesheet alleging that he had impersonated his brother in a written test conducted by Bank – Disciplinary Enquiry held and thereafter services of the respondent was terminated by the appellant in the year 1982 – Respondent raised an industrial dispute – Tribunal by award dated 2008 held that charge of impersonation was not proved and dismissal was unjustified, thus reinstated respondent but without back wages – Respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court in the year 2009 challenging the award of tribunal insofar as relates to the denial of back wages – Appellants also filed a writ petition before the High Court in the year 2009 challenging the award so far relates to the reinstatement of services of respondent – High Court by a common judgment dismissed both the writ petitions – In compliance with the judgment of High Court appellant reinstated the respondent – In 2013 respondent filed another writ petition to reinstate the respondent to the post of Agricultural Finance officer and also for the fixation of pay and seniority – Appellant objected that the writ petition is barred by the principles of res judicata – High Court by judgment dated 2015 held that the appellant shall be entitled for all the benefits upon reinstatement except back wages – Writ appeal was dismissed – Before the Supreme Court, appellant-bank contended that principles of res judicata applied to the writ proceedings – On appeal, held: The issue in the earlier writ petition was regarding legality of the award – However, the question in the second writ petition was, whether, for the purposes of seniority and fixation of pay, the respondent was to be treated as a newly appointed employee – Matter-in-issue in both the writ petitions is different therefore principles of res judicata inapplicable – No infirmity with the concurrent findings of the Single Bench and the Division Bench of the High Court – Appeal dismissed.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by INDIRA BANERJEE, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 3rd April 2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior dismissing Writ Appeal No. 310 of 2015 filed by the Appellants against an order dated 7th August 2015, passed by the Single Bench, allowing the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being Writ Petition No. 1571 of 2013, filed by the Respondent. 3. On or about 23rd April 1975, the Respondent was appointed to the post of Agricultural Assistant in the
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →