LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/bijay-kumar-manish-kumar-huf-vs-ashwin-bhanulal-desai-20240517/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Bijay Kumar Manish Kumar HUF vs Ashwin Bhanulal Desai

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
17 May 2024
Case No.
I.A. No.120219 of 2020
Result
Disposed
Bench
J.K. Maheshwari, Sanjay Karol
Citation
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 859 : 2024 INSC 445
Acts & Sections
West Bengal Tenancy Act, 1997 TP Act
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 5 S.C.R. 859 : 2024 INSC 445
Issue for consideration
The interlocutory applications have been filed seeking direction for payment of rent and other associated benefits in connection with the property which is the subject matter of the dispute.
Headnote

Rent Control and Eviction – Non-payment of rent – The lis governs four different tenancies – Petitioner-applicant landlord alleges non-payment of rent and has filed applications in the pending SLPs seeking direction for payment of ‘monthly occupational charges’ following the prevalent market rate:

Held: On account of non-payment of rent, the lease was forfeited/determined – However, the respondent-tenant has neither delivered the possession of the property nor paid the rent – Also, the petitioner submitted a report of an independent valuer – The assessment of the rentals, made by the valuer, is @ INR 41/- per Sq.ft. – It is settled that a tenant who once entered the property in question lawfully, continues in possession after his right to do so stands extinguished, is liable to compensate the landlord for such time period after the right of occupancy expires – Prima facie, it is clear that the respondent-tenant had delayed the payment of rent and/or other dues, payable to the petitioner-applicant landlord – This denial of monetary benefits accruing from the property, when viewed in terms of the unchallenged market report forming part of the record is undoubtedly substantial – This order for deposit of the amount claimed by the petitioner-applicant is being passed, to ensure complete justice inter se the parties – It is important to note that when a property is rented out, it is to ensure that the landlord by way of the property is able to secure some income – If the income remains static over a long period of time or in certain cases, as in the present case, yields no income, then such a landlord would be within his rights, subject of course, to the agreement with their tenant, to be aggrieved by the same – Therefore, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount of Rs. 5,15,05,512/-. [Paras 13, 19, 21 and 23]

Keywords: Rent · Non-payment of Rent · Monthly Occupational charges · Independent valuer · Possession of property · Right of occupancy · Denial of monetary benefits · Corpus Juris Secundum · Tenancy at sufferance · Mesne Profit · Expiry of lease · Determination of lease · Forfeiture · Termination

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Ankit Gyan. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Sanjay Karol, J. 1. These petitions for special leave to appeal seek to lay a challenge to the judgment and order dated 7th November 2019 passed in C.O.Nos.1582-85 of 2019 by the High Court of Calcutta. The learned Single Judge while deciding the issue as to whether the West Bengal Tenancy Act, 19971 or the Transfer of Property Act, 18822 was to be applied for framing of the issues in the instant landlord-tenant dispute, held that the Tenancy Act would govern the same. 2. Impugning the judgment of the learned Single Judge, the present Special Leave Petitions were filed before this
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →