LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/all-are-residents-of-village-chunukoli-vs-state-of-odisha-20260318-2/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Constitutional

All Are Residents Of Village: Chunukoli vs State Of Odisha

Court
Orissa High Court
Date
18 March 2026
Case No.
W.P.(C) No.6497 of 2024 and W.P.(C) No.15819 of 2025
Bench
Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Acts & Sections
Constitution §226 Constitution §227 Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional…
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioners, members of a tribal community residing in forest area of Andharua Gram Panchayat, Khordha District near Bhubaneswar, filed this writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation opposing the alleged unauthorised deviation of a road from the original Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP). The petitioners contended that the realignment was intended to evict tribal occupants and demolish their dwelling houses, religious shrines and community activity centres, which are entitled to protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

The petitioners sought declarations that the road realignment was illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, and prayed for writs of mandamus, certiorari and prohibition directing the authorities to desist from implementing the alleged illegal realignment, to proceed with construction along the original gazetted road trajectory notified on 14 May 2018, and to restrain eviction and demolition of villagers' structures without due process of law.

The two writ petitions raising connected issues concerning road construction, tribal forest rights and displacement of tribal communities in the Bhubaneswar peri-urban area were heard together by a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court comprising the Chief Justice and Justice Murahari Sri Raman.
Catchwords: Public Interest Litigation · tribal forest dwellers · forest rights · road realignment · Comprehensive Development Plan · eviction · demolition · scheduled tribes · traditional forest dwellers · Bhubaneswar Development Authority · writ of mandamus · writ of certiorari · writ of prohibition · Articles 226 and 227

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 27, Cited by 0] Orissa High Court All Are Residents Of Village: Chunukoli vs State Of Odisha on 18 March, 2026 ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6497 of 2024 and W.P.(C) No.15819 of 2025 In the matter of an Application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 *** W.P.(C) No.6497 of 2024: 1. Basanta Digi Aged about 50 years Son of Late Dasarathi Digi. 2. Sukul Hansda Aged about 49 years Son of late Durga Charan Hansda. 3. Narayan Hansada Aged about 69 years Son of Jagannath Hansada. 4. Rajen Puran Aged about 32 years Son of Lalu Puran.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Orissa HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →