Headnote
AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The defendant-licensor of a shop room in a shopping mall at Palakkad challenged an order of the Principal Sub Court, Palakkad dismissing IA No.6/2024 filed under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC for a decree on admission and directing transfer of the counter-claim along with the suit to the Commercial Court. The plaintiff-licensee had taken the property on a ten-year license from 26/4/2018 to run a supermarket. The defendant revoked the license on account of alleged default in payment of license fee and filed a counter-claim seeking mandatory injunction for ejectment, relying on an endorsement (Ext.A1(a)) purportedly made by the plaintiff agreeing to vacate within twenty days. The plaintiff denied the endorsement and contended that the commercial dispute could only be tried by the Commercial Court under Section 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
The High Court of Kerala, on a reference order, addressed two distinct issues: first, whether the trial court was correct in dismissing IA No.6/2024 under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC on the basis that there was no unequivocal admission warranting a decree, and second, whether the counter-claim filed by the defendant seeking ejectment was maintainable before the civil court or had to be transferred to the Commercial Court constituted under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
The court examined the scope of Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC and the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, particularly Section 15(2), and considered several Supreme Court decisions on admissions, including Uttam Singh Duggal, Karam Kapahi, S.M. Asif and Karan Kapoor. The judgment is in the nature of a reference order reflecting the court's interim deliberation on these questions of law arising from the challenge to the trial court's common order.
Catchwords:
Civil revision petition
license deed
shop room
supermarket
default in license fee
revocation of license
mandatory injunction
ejectment
counter-claim
Order XII Rule 6 CPC
decree on admission
Commercial Courts Act 2015
Section 15(2)
transfer to commercial court
maintainability of counter-claim
admission in pleadings
discretionary power
reference order
© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain
per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Full Judgment Text
```json
{
"title": "Abdullakutty Haji vs H. Mushtafa",
"case_number": "CRP No. 133 of 2024 and OP(C) No. 753 of 2024",
"side": "civil",
"date_of_judgment": "2024-09-25",
"bench": "Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath",
"reportable": false,
"parties_petitioner": "Abdullakutty Haji, aged 66 years, S/o Thappy Aboobacker, Thappy House, Palathingal, Ullanam Post, Neduva Village, Tirurangadi Taluk, Malappuram",
"parties_respondent": "H. Mushtafa, aged 55 years, S/o Hussainar, Baithul Minar, Nadakavu, Akatethara, Palakkad",
"result": "other",
"headnote": "The defendant-licensor of a shop
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.