CCI Sets Final Hearing in Apple Antitrust Case<\/b><\/p>\n
The <\/span>Competition Commission of India (CCI)<\/b> has moved forward in its antitrust proceedings against Apple, fixing a <\/span>final hearing for 21 May 2026<\/b> after the company failed to submit key financial data sought during investigation.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The case originates from a <\/span>2021 complaint<\/b>, with a 2024 investigation finding that Apple may have abused its dominant position by requiring developers to use its in-app payment system.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Apple has argued before the Delhi High Court that penalty calculations based on global turnover could expose it to fines of up to <\/span>$38 billion<\/b>, which it has challenged as disproportionate.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n What stands out is not just the case, but the direction. India is increasingly aligning with global regulators in examining <\/span>platform control, app ecosystems, and digital market dominance<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n Aadhaar App Mandate Dropped After Industry Pushback<\/b><\/p>\n In April 2026, the Government decided not to proceed with a proposal requiring smartphone manufacturers to pre-install the <\/span>Aadhaar application<\/b> on devices.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Aadhaar system currently covers around <\/span>1.34 billion people<\/b>, making it one of the largest digital identity frameworks globally.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The proposal faced resistance from device manufacturers citing <\/span>security risks, cost implications, and system-level constraints<\/b>. The withdrawal indicates a cautious approach where regulatory ambition meets practical industry limits.<\/span><\/p>\n Antitrust Enforcement Expands Beyond Technology<\/b><\/p>\n In a separate development, the CCI\u2019s ongoing cartel investigation involving <\/span>Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev)<\/b> saw the company being reclassified from a witness to a party under investigation.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The case involves alleged exclusivity arrangements with <\/span>42 retailers in Telangana<\/b>, potentially restricting market competition.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n If violations are established, penalties under competition law may extend to <\/span>up to three times profits or 10% of annual turnover per year of contravention<\/b>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This signals that enforcement is no longer limited to technology platforms. Traditional sectors are also under scrutiny.<\/span><\/p>\n Digital Regulation Continues to Evolve<\/b><\/p>\n Recent policy discussions have also included proposals to make certain government advisories legally binding on digital platforms, potentially affecting <\/span>safe harbour protections<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n While not yet finalised in April, these developments indicate a regulatory shift toward <\/span>greater enforceability and platform accountability<\/b>, particularly in areas involving content control and digital communication.<\/span><\/p>\n April did not bring a single sweeping legislative change. What it did show is a pattern.<\/span><\/p>\n For businesses, the shift is clear. Compliance is no longer limited to filing and reporting. It increasingly involves how business models themselves are structured and operated.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" CCI Sets Final Hearing in Apple Antitrust Case The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has moved forward in its antitrust proceedings against Apple, fixing a final hearing for 21 May 2026 after the company failed to submit key financial data sought during investigation.\u00a0\u00a0 The case originates from a 2021 complaint, with a 2024 investigation finding…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":710,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33,70],"tags":[44],"thb-sponsors":[],"class_list":["post-709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-33","category-may","tag-corporate-law-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=709"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":711,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709\/revisions\/711"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=709"},{"taxonomy":"thb-sponsors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalfirms.in\/magazine\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thb-sponsors?post=709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Where This Leaves Businesses<\/b><\/h3>\n
\n