[ad_1]
A bench of justices Ajay Rastogi and CT Ravi Kumar said it found no reasonable justification for the high court to call upon the appellant (husband) to submit a demand draft of Rs 10 lakh in availing the benefit of pre-arrest bail.
“Consequently, the appeal stands allowed and the order passed by the high court dated 04/05-03/2022 directing the appellant to deposit a demand draft of Rs 10 lakh is hereby set aside,” it said.
The top court noted that the case is indeed a matrimonial dispute between the couple and their marriage was solemnised according to Hindu rites and customs on June 11, 2015, but later because of differences, an application was filed by the husband seeking dissolution of marriage on July 8, 2016.
It noted that the wife in the meantime also instituted a criminal complaint against her husband on July 27, 2017 before the chief judicial magistrate, which was later converted into a FIR on February 22, 2018 for offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
The bench, in its order dated October 18 said that being the non-cognisable offence, the appellant (husband) approached the court by filing an application seeking pre-arrest bail.
It said that the high court granted pre-arrest bail on the premise that the husband shall resume the conjugal life as stated in his bail application.
The bench observed that when the ground realities are such that the parties involved are into matrimonial discord, then instituting inter se proceedings to restore conjugal rights is otherwise not possible.
“At this point of time, the high court exercised its powers under Section 482 CrPC and passed the order directing the appellant to submit a demand draft of Rs 10 lakh as ad-interim victim compensation, as revealed from the order dated 04/05-03-2021 to permit the appellant to avail the benefit of pre-arrest bail,” the bench said. PTI MNL ZMN
[ad_2]
Source link